Lemonade From Lemons

6 min read

For the last five years, smallish Family Focus Federal Credit Union (Family Focus) in Omaha, Nebraska, has defied the odds. While most credit unions at its asset size, $31 million, have struggled, and many have given up entirely by merging with larger credit unions, Family Focus has thrived. For the five years ended December 2015, ROA averaged 1.4%. The high was 2.04% and the low was 1.13%. For the year ended December 2015, net interest margin was 5.26%. By any yardstick, attaining this level of success borders on phenomenal. In this article, we will endeavor to uncover and explain the key factors for the success of this credit union.

Family Focus is primarily a single SEG credit union serving employees and family members of the Metropolitan Utilities District (MUD) in Omaha, Nebraska. Its field of membership is small, with a count of 850 employees in the SEG group but also serving family members. Although this field of membership is well paid, it is maturing and does not present the opportunities for loan demand that it once did. In fact, for many similar credit unions, this is the recipe for stagnation and ultimate failure—not because members don’t pay back their loans, but because members mature out of the lending categories into savers and the credit union is unable to transition and acquire new borrowing members. Family Focus has overcome this obstacle with a dedicated marketing culture and commitment to members. It offers traditional credit union products and has avoided indirect lending. In fact, the credit union does not have a single indirect loan on its books. It does deploy a risk-based lending strategy in which loan rates are based on credit worthiness. For the year ended December 2015, loans-to-total assets were 79.5%, leaving a liquidity fund, some very short-term liquid investments, and the new building to round out the assets. The liability side is traditional shares and certificates. Net worth is above peer group.

This credit union clearly is doing some things right. Let’s identify some of them and then focus on the ones that seems to be most impactful. The credit union operates very efficiently. It is in every sense a full-service credit union with a free-standing new, albeit small, building and a menu of member services that are as robust as those offered by larger credit unions. Operating hours are what you would expect. In the past ten years, the credit union has doubled its asset size without increasing the number of employees. In other words, every employee is managing twice the assets that he/she was doing ten years ago. The credit union is staffed with employees who truly understand what credit unions are all about. As I interviewed employees and directors, the word “love” kept popping out spontaneously. The management of the credit union, starting with the Board of Directors, has truly cultivated an environment where members are looked at and cared for as family. On the other hand, each employee and volunteer that I interviewed understands unequivocally that the credit union is a business and absolutely needs to be managed in a businesslike way in order to prosper over the long-run. The credit union excels at walking the fine line between looking out for its members and managing the credit union in a businesslike way where it can earn net worth and capitalize future growth. Over the last five years, the net worth ratio has increased from 10.8% to 13.7%.

As I interviewed the volunteers and key management employees, the most apparent difference between Family Focus and 3,000+ similar credit unions in the U.S. is the credit union’s commitment to a sales/marketing culture. Management, including the Board of Directors, recognized a decade ago that business as usual would not produce success. When her predecessor resigned to manage another credit union, Amy Brodersen was promoted to the CEO position of the struggling small credit union. At the time, Amy had been employed with the credit union 16 years, starting as a member service rep in a three-person office. Amy says she loved the credit union from the start. The members were great and the credit union’s business philosophy fit her personal outlook. Her previous experience had been in a savings and loan where the only goal was profitability. She had found a home at the credit union.

Amy tells us that it took her about two years to determine what needed to be done for the credit union to prosper. Even in 2006, the aging field of membership was shifting its emphasis from borrowing to savings. The decision was made that the credit union would convert itself into a sales/marketing and member service institution and ultimately was reorganized along those lines. An outside consultant was engaged to assist in the conversion. The transition was complicated and painful for some employees. Mistakes occurred and it was a two-steps-forward-and-one-back-process.
The credit union staff is now organized into two distinct divisions which are referred to as Day 1 and Day 2. Day 1 serves members when they have an initial need or a new need recurs. If a prospective member walks in the door, they will be served by the Day 1 staff. A current member who has a new need, a new loan for example, or who wants to open a new share relationship or certificate, will also be served by the Day 1 staff. The second segment is referred to as Day 2. These staff members serve the recurring and more traditional needs of the credit union’s members.

The sales/marketing culture resides with every member of the staff. However, the primary responsibility for new business lies with the Day 1 group. That includes new loans, new members, and new depositary relationships. Loans and deposits are both important to the credit union. It is effectively totally loaned out and always looking for new deposits.
The leader of the Day 1 effort, in other words, the marketing effort, is Kari Rager, Chief Solutions Officer. Kari is a long-time credit union employee who predates the conversion to a sales culture. However, she recognized the need to change and enthusiastically endorsed the new sales culture. Her chief responsibility is to oversee the marketing function. She is strategic minded and results focused. She shares the deep commitment to the credit union and its members. Commitment is a common thread discovered in almost every interview with the volunteers and staff. Kari is totally committed to the marketing environment. Her responsibilities include driving business growth and new products. Her primary focus is on ensuring the credit union’s sales culture functions effectively. Her enthusiasm is contagious.

Dave Lorimor is the Member Solutions Consultant. He describes his job as 90% sales. Dave never worked at a credit union before Family Focus, but had extensive sales experience at car dealerships and call centers. Prior to coming to Family Focus he had never belonged to a credit union. His college degree is in secondary education. Dave’s comment was, “Sales is sales; product knowledge is important, but never sells anything.” Every request for a new loan or share relationship goes through Dave. He is the member’s advocate. He also describes sales as a contact sport—the more contact, the more success. He visits the small branch located on the MUD headquarters on paydays, promotes a barbeque with members, and participates in the MUD employee events. He is a unique individual in the credit union environment.

Most credit union loan officers did not start out in sales. In fact, most credit union loan officers are what they are because they don’t want to be in sales. In sales, things are often stressful. Successful salespersons are extremely well-paid. This is the point at which many attempts for credit unions to remake themselves as sales or marketing organizations fall apart. Many sales professionals do not have the temperament to work at a credit union. Finding an effective salesperson willing to work for less pay but a more comfortable environment could be tricky. For Dave Lorimor, it was a tradeoff. He traded a 70- to 80-hour a week, high-stress, well-paid sales position for a job that allows more regular hours, but less pay. He does receive a salary, but the majority of his compensation is based on sales success. Sales success is defined as new loans and deposits.
Dave’s counterpart is Carol Nary, Member Solutions Analyst. Carol is an experienced loan underwriter and performs that function independently. This is where the control function for sound lending comes in. Dave, the salesman, finds the loan applicant and completes the loan application. Then Carol underwrites and approves the loan. The marketing function has no approval function. A third clerical staff person also supports Dave and Carol in originating loans. Yes, it’s true there are conflicts. Dave effectively is the member advocate. Every loan application is a great one in Dave’s mind. Carol represents the credit union and looks after its interests. Basically, they work it out.

What the credit union refers to as the Day 2 staff are the employees who serve the credit union’s members on a day-to-day basis—what many of us would call member service reps and tellers. While their function is more traditional, each employee of the credit union understands and is trained extensively in the marketing function. The Day 2 staff can augment their regular salary with marketing incentives by providing leads to the Day 1 group. Each knows that their livelihood and continued employment depend on the success the credit union achieves in attracting new loans and deposits.

So, who’s responsible for the success the credit union has achieved in recent years? Is it the CEO, Amy? Her marketing staff? Or maybe this vision originated with the Board of Directors. Each of the above deflect credit to the others. Amy credits the Board of Directors and the staff. The staff credits Amy and each other. The Board credits Amy and the staff. Amy emphasizes the board’s involvement and support. In the end it appears to be truly a team effort with each team member understanding and effectively carrying out their respective roles.

An intense sales culture such as Family Focus is challenging to achieve. It takes time and total commitment by the board, management, and team members. It may not be for every credit union. But for Family Focus it has meant the difference between achieving success or being an also-ran.

Related/Popular Articles

As we move into 2021, the following topics might be worth discussing and considering with your management team.

Earnings

During the first half of 2020, net interest margins came under substantial pressure as market interest rates were shocked dramatically downward. Net interest margins are expected to remain under downward pressure throughout 2021 as investment portfolios continue to reprice lower and share growth continues.

One of the easiest and quickest responses to declining interest income is to address the cost of funds. Many credit unions still have room to decrease their cost of funds, as shown in the September 2020 ending period graph below.

Yield vs. Cost of FundsSource: NCUA

Delinquency

Based on the September 2020 call report data, loan delinquencies and net charge-offs remained low and were below September 2019 delinquencies. Loan forbearance and other assistance programs in place through the entirety of 2020 may have helped delinquencies. Also, certain sectors of the economy are not as impacted as others. The unemployment rate is expected to continue drifting lower in 2021. However, as the assistance programs are lifted, delinquencies and charge-offs are expected to increase as unemployment remains substantially above the years leading up to the pandemic.

Total Loan Delinquency Rates By Category

Source: MHSI Online Peer Analysis Module through September 2020

Credit Union Philosophy

Serving the underserved has always been a hallmark of credit unions, and now more than ever, there is an opportunity to do this for many credit union members. As these times have been challenging, credit unions can continue to evaluate and prioritize how to best serve members in the coming year, especially those under financial stress. Exploring how to provide service to those that are underbanked might be an opportunity. One option may include evaluating risk-based lending policies and programs, especially given the robust liquidity on most credit union balance sheets. New and alternative avenues to bolster income should continue to be explored.

Digital and Technology

As the pandemic shifts and prolongs, credit unions should evaluate if their electronic delivery channels meet members and potential members’ needs. Moving to or improving digital delivery channels should be accelerated and prioritized. Digital delivery should include evaluating loan origination and servicing channels to maximize new loan volumes. Online and remote financial services will continue to grow and may be the preferred way members access and manage their financial activities.

Balance Sheet Growth

Before the pandemic, many experts anticipated credit union loan growth to taper off but remain positive. After the first quarter of 2021, loan production became unpredictable, however, by the end of the third quarter, annualized loan growth was 6.34%. Real estate lending, driven by the abruptly lower interest rate environment, helped with the growth. Experts anticipate loan growth to be around 6.0% to 6.5% over the next 12 months as the economy recovers.

The first few months of 2021 may see strong share growth as the second round of government assistance and stimulus takes hold, and households remain reluctant to spend until signs of COVID easing and warmer weather occur. Share growth last year increased at an annualized rate of over 18% and is expected to be approximately 8.0% to 10.0% in the coming year. If double-digit growth continues, earnings sufficient enough to sustain capital will be critical. If economic conditions improve and overall consumer activity increases, loan growth and increasing long-term interest rates could counter some of the anticipated income pressures. Fortunately, the credit union industry is very well capitalized and able to ride out the adverse conditions and absorb some more growth, even if earnings are reduced. 

Several years back, I went to Mexico for a vacation. While there, I found a ceramic hand-painted frog-shaped planter that I wanted. My husband loves the hunt, and his quest began. Every time we saw a frog-planter, he would start negotiating with the vendor to get the lowest possible price. We searched for several days and would stop in different towns and check the markets while enjoying our vacation and exploring. When we found a frog, he would inquire about the price and negotiate for further discounts. After a few days and no success at getting the cost of the frog below a certain point, my husband declared, “we have hit the bottom of the frog market.”

Future GDP Projections

In September, the Federal Reserve Chairman spoke publicly on several occasions and reiterated that the central bank is committed to helping the economy “for as long as it takes.” He noted continued improvements in the economy, but also acknowledged a highly uncertain path ahead. The September FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) projections are now projecting a full-year GDP decline of 3.7%. This is substantially better than their previous expectation of a 6.5% decline. However, they lowered their 2021 outlook from 5.0% to 4.0% and their 2022 outlook from 3.5% to 3.0%. Their 2023 outlook is at 2.50%.

Interest Rates and Economic Uncertainties

The FOMC also indicated that they would allow inflation to run above 2.0% on a sustained basis before any federal funds rate increases. As such, most individual members of the Committee indicated that the federal funds rate could remain close to zero through 2023. Some economists and analysts even think that we may not see an increase in the federal funds rate until 2024 or 2025. They believe that it will take up to five years for the global economy to fully recover to pre-pandemic levels.

The risks to the FOMC economic growth projections are high. Even the Chairman of the FOMC acknowledged the economic uncertainty of the path ahead. Following the sharp rebound in many economic data measures and drop in the unemployment rate, some recent measures have disappointed compared to expectations and some are indicating a recovery that is stalling. At the current time of this article, the nature of further fiscal stimulus continues to be negotiated in congress and some are not expecting a resolution until after the presidential election. Of course this only adds to the current economic uncertainty.

What is highly certain over the short to medium term timeframe is that interest rates will not likely be increasing more than just relatively minor fluctuations in the medium to long end of the U.S. Treasury yield curve. It is more likely that potential risks on the horizon could drive medium and longer-term U.S. Treasury yields even lower.

Reassessing Balance Sheet Strategy

Given the above outlook, it would certainly seem that some credit union balance sheet strategies of recent years should be reevaluated for the foreseeable future. Reassessing asset allocation strategies is possibly more relevant at the current time than at any time in the past several years. For example, the credit union may want to ask itself how much should we be redeploying assets into two to three year investment CDs given current interest rates on those maturities. If the answer is less than previous years, then what are the alternatives we can explore.

Priorities Going Forward

In exploring alternatives, the first priority for credit unions is of course serving members. Assessments and considerations could include expanding the types of loans offered, reevaluating risk based lending allocations, increasing real estate concentrations, debt consolidation programs, and loan payment support alternatives to name just a few. Secondary to the first priority are considerations such as allocations to loan participations and alternative investments. For example, should the credit union assess CUSO or similar investment possibilities. What are all of the possibilities for these type of investments that may be available to the credit union? After all, an alternative of earning five basis points at the corporate credit union with too much of assets is not likely to accomplish any priorities or goals for the credit union.

The present time and foreseeable future is a great time for credit unions to really show how they can serve and support members during these challenging times. Being there for your members is for sure the highest purpose for the credit union and always assessing ways to provide service and assistance to them will always be the credit union’s first priority. In addition and secondarily, now more than any time in recent years it may make sense to really take a deep dive into the above asset allocation assessments, considerations, and possibilities. Ideally, the best answers going forward would combine the first priority with the second to optimize balance sheet performance while best serving members.

Scroll to Top