Tags

With the dramatic changes in the economy due to the Coronavirus, credit unions are wondering what they should expect moving forward. Even though this recession is unlike any other, we can look at data from the financial crisis, or the great recession, to get some clues as to what might happen.

Increased Deposits or “Surge Shares”

Starting in 2008, deposits increased substantially at almost every credit union and were often referred to as “surge shares“. There was much debate as to whether the surge shares would eventually leave, but in the end, deposits did not decline but steadily increased for the next ten years. We have already seen a sizable increase in deposits at credit unions this time around, and we could see even more, especially as talks of another stimulus check are underway. Credit unions should plan for multiple scenarios, but a strategy to maximize profitability with the influx of deposits should remain a top priority. Unless additional deposits are needed for loan funding or the new deposits can be profitably reinvested, credit unions should employ strategies to minimize deposit growth and possibly even shrink deposits. Lowering deposit rates, including certificate rates, should strongly be considered if it has not already been done. Dropping deposit rates below competition rates may not be enough to discourage the inflow of deposits, but it is a critical component to maximizing the profit margin. If deposits leave due to low rates, then we know the money is rate sensitive and the credit union knows how to likely get it back when needed; just raise rates.

Change in Deposit Composition

During the financial crisis we saw deposits move from certificates to regular shares. We also saw members purchasing shorter term CDs as the yield of longer-term CDs was not worth the extended term. The potential changes in deposit mix, both by term and by type, and the impact on the cost of funds should be anticipated.

Deposit Composition Graph 7 2020
Share Certfiicate Average Weighted Maturity Graph 7 2020

Increase in Loan Charge Offs

As we get further into this financial crisis and as government intervention fades, we will begin to see loan charge offs increase. The unemployment rate at the end of May was 13.3%. In comparison, the unemployment rate peaked at 10.0% during the financial crisis and the total loan charge off rate for all credit unions went from 0.40% to 1.31%. If we use the historical relationship between the unemployment rate and the charge off rate, at an unemployment of 13.3% we could expect the charge off rate to jump to 1.57% from the current 0.57%. This recession is different, so the relationship between unemployment and charge off rates may also be different. We do not have the data yet to see how unemployment has affected delinquencies or charge offs for almost all types of loans. However, credit card delinquency and charge offs have been steadily increasing over the past few years and are almost to financial crisis levels.

FRED Graph 7 2020
Total Loan Charge Off & Recovery Graph 7 2020
Credit Card Charge Off & Recovery 7 2020

Changes in Loan Composition

The loan composition also saw a dramatic shift during and since the financial crisis. New vehicle loans as a percentage of the loan portfolio rose during the crisis and then fell as we recovered. Used vehicle loans did the opposite. Real estate loan composition shifted and 1st liens became a much larger portion, but it appears to be offset by the decrease in home equities. It seems many people may have taken advantage of the increase in home values and refinanced or moved the Jr. lien debt into the 1st lien. This move to longer-term fixed-rate products has caused the average weighted maturity of the loan portfolio to increase, and potential interest rate risk to be greater.

Loan Composition Graph 1 7 2020
Loan Composition Graph 2 7 2020
Real Estate Loan Composition Graph 7 2020
Loan Estimated Average Weighted Maturity Graph 7 2020

 

Lower Net Income

Historically, when rates are lower net income is also lower. Often, loan and investment rates drop farther than deposit rates. At the same time, many credit unions struggle to even make loans, and charge offs typically increase in a declining rate environment. The loans to assets ratio did not return to the pre-financial crisis number, and this recession may halt or erase what progress has been made. Compounding this issue is that investment rates are at or near historic lows, and all of the inflow of new deposits and reinvesting of maturing investments will be in lower-yielding instruments.

Loans to Assets Ratio Graph 7 2020
Annualized Net Income Graph 7 2020

Conclusion

It is important to remember these charts and graphs represent the aggregate of the credit union industry, and many credit unions saw much more dramatic shifts in their balance sheet, charge off rates, and earnings than shown. We are presenting this information to help as credit unions explore options, anticipate changes, plan, and prepare to manage through this new crisis. Each credit union should evaluate how they performed during and since the last economic downturn and be ready for the potential for history to repeat itself. If credit unions properly prepare for this and future recessions, they can maintain healthy margins and help their members through their financial difficulties.

If you would like more information on the MHSI Peer Analysis tool and how it can be used to show your credit union and your specified peer’s historical data, please contact us at info@markhsmith.com or call us at 1-800-268-7795.

Average fee and other operating income were both increasing leading up to the financial crisis. However, since the financial crisis, fee income has been steadily decreasing and other operating income has been increasing. The increase in other operating income has just about offset the decrease in fee income. This trend becomes more pronounced as the asset size of credit unions increases (see graphs below). What do these changes in income mean going forward?

Average Annualized Fee and Other Operating Income (% of Avg Assets in Basis Points)
All Credit Unions


MHSI Interactive Peer Analysis

Average Annualized Fee and Other Operating Income (% of Avg Assets in Basis Points)
Credit Unions > $500 Million in Assets


MHSI Interactive Peer Analysis

Fee income is described in the NCUA 5300 Call Report Instructions as “Fees charged for services (i.e., overdraft fees, ATM fees, credit card fees, etc.).” Fee income must be directly from the credit union members—while other operating income is from third-parties. Common other operating income items are income derived from selling real estate loans on the secondary market and interchange income.

As net interest margins have been squeezed the past 10 years, many credit unions have relied on fee and other operating income to keep their ROA positive. But rather than put that strain on their members, credit union managers have been looking to revenue sources other than their members directly.

Lowering fee income can be a great benefit to members. It does, however, come with a risk to the financial stability of the credit union. Currently, credit unions have been able to offset the fee income with other operating income. While continually seeking other sources of income to ultimately benefit members is prudent and proper management of the credit union, reliance on any particular source can be problematic. For instance, a lot of credit unions have increased selling real estate loans on the secondary market. If the market for real estate loans changes, then there can be consequences not only to the loan portfolio, but also to other operating income. If fee income has been allowed to drop due to the increase in other operating income, then this downturn in income could spell trouble.

Fee income can have a negative stigma, but for many members the services that go along with the fees far outweigh the costs. For example, offering the underserved better service and pricing for payday loan type services can be a win for everybody, but particularly the member in need of this service. Finding the right balance in fee income can be tricky and takes much more individual thought and approach. For almost all credit unions, fee income is an essential pillar to financial viability and in turn the ability to provide the services that all members need. The consequences of a continually decreasing fee income should be defined and measured along with follow-up on possible adjustments to undesired trends.

Just as credit unions should monitor concentration risk and diversify loan and investment portfolios, monitoring and diversifying fee and other operating income is also essential—especially if it is being relied upon for a positive ROA. It is important to look at the sources of fee and other operating income and identify potential concentration risks. This process can also help identify areas of new income potential or a need to review fee structure. Credit union management should be aware of the risks that come with lowering fee income and look for a diversified fee and other operating income structure that will support the credit union’s financial stability.

Scroll to Top